Bug #11811

MOD016 :Transaction fee maintenance - FD051_Create Charge Type by Amount

Added by Nurul Akmal over 3 years ago. Updated over 3 years ago.

Status:Work Completed-End life cycleStart date:May 18, 2021
Priority:NormalDue date:May 26, 2021
Assignee:Nurul Akmal% Done:

100%

Category:-Spent time:-
Target version:-

Description

Issue 1:
Able to set From Amount greater than To Amount

Issue 2:
To change Source and Receiver drop down list
'RPP' to 'BIFAST'

Additional

Issue 3:
To follow Charge Type value in SRS

a. Service Fee
b. Processing Fee
c. Penalty Fee
d. Name Inquiry (Account Number)
e. Proxy Inquiry

History

#1 Updated by Siti Norahayu Mohd Desa over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)

#2 Updated by Bramantyo Pujo Wiyono over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from New - Begin Life Cycle to Internal Testing
  • Assignee changed from Bramantyo Pujo Wiyono to Nurul Akmal
  • % Done changed from 0 to 70

#3 Updated by Nurul Akmal over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Internal Testing to Development / Work In Progress
  • Assignee changed from Nurul Akmal to Bramantyo Pujo Wiyono

Tested.

Currently all Amount fields only accept numeric & dot.

Expected:
To allow numeric, dot and comma as per indonesia monetary format.

#4 Updated by Siti Norahayu Mohd Desa over 3 years ago

  • Description updated (diff)
  • Due date set to May 26, 2021

#5 Updated by Bramantyo Pujo Wiyono over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Development / Work In Progress to Internal Testing
  • Assignee changed from Bramantyo Pujo Wiyono to Nurul Akmal

#6 Updated by Nurul Akmal over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Internal Testing to Development / Work In Progress
  • Assignee changed from Nurul Akmal to Bramantyo Pujo Wiyono

Issue 2:
To remove dash at BIFAST.

For Amount fields all tested, but Fix Amount field only accept (16,2). Expected is (19,2) as per other amount fields.
System will throw error (error while performing your request) if enter more than 16,2.
Kindly assist to check. Thank you.

#7 Updated by Bramantyo Pujo Wiyono over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Development / Work In Progress to Internal Testing
  • Assignee changed from Bramantyo Pujo Wiyono to Nurul Akmal

Correction about (19,2)
last time i explain this as nineteen digit + two digit decimal, this one is not correct.
the correct one is nineteen digit total with two digit decimal.
ex: 12.345.678.901.234.567,11

#8 Updated by Nurul Akmal over 3 years ago

  • Status changed from Internal Testing to Work Completed-End life cycle
  • % Done changed from 70 to 100

Noted on the info. Tested and passed both items. Thank you.

Also available in: Atom PDF