Bug #5221
Follow Up #5111: KFH_UAT Tracking (URF-14-12-163)
URF-14-12-163: IBG-014
| Status: | Work Completed-End life cycle | Start date: | January 29, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | |||
| Assignee: |  Norhaidah Md Dasuki | % Done: | 90% | ||
| Category: | IBSCR068&072 UAT | Spent time: | - | ||
| Target version: | - |
Description
a) Why there are 2 columns for sender names in the RFI Enquiry Report? What are the differences (Column AE & AP)? - CLARIFIED
b) Why Sender Name was “NIL”, should reflect the sender name info after nacha processing - TO VERIFY
c) Sender Account No. should be reflected after nacha processing i/o after crediting - TO VERIFY
History
#1
Updated by Norhaidah Md Dasuki over 9 years ago
- Status changed from New - Begin Life Cycle to Pending Customer Feedback
- Assignee changed from Norhaidah Md Dasuki to Yap Kah Yan
- % Done changed from 0 to 90
30/1/15:
- Fix double sender name at rfi report
- Fix sender name null
- Sender Account & Sender Name reflected after crediting. For RFI processing only data from nacha file.
Release patch - \\10.20.8.35\InternetBanking\Production\20150130_ibscr072&068_fix_013_014_015
-----------
25/02 - Chooi: Sender Name and Sender Account No. still didn't reflect after nacha processing. However tested ok where no duplicate Sender Column in Corus Report.
25/02 - Get Shikin to assist with simulation
----------
27/2/15 - release merging fix patch
\\10.20.8.35\InternetBanking\Production\20150226_ibscr072&068_re_merge
(IT to simulate testing)
#2
Updated by Yap Kah Yan over 9 years ago
- Status changed from Pending Customer Feedback to Work Completed-End life cycle
- Assignee changed from Yap Kah Yan to Norhaidah Md Dasuki
Migrated to production