Support #5380
[SCP ID :##2722##] : Unsuccessful eIBFT transaction after migration date 27/06/2015
Status: | Closed - End of life cycle | Start date: | June 29, 2015 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Urgent | Due date: | ||
Assignee: | Zahir Abd Latif | % Done: | 100% | |
Category: | - | Spent time: | - | |
Target version: | - |
Description
Kartono
Kindly attend this issue
Most eIBFT transaction was unsuccessful after migration on 27/06/2015.
Trnx details as below: RIB Transaction Enquiry -Details Transaction ID 20150629000003097370 Transaction Description Favourite Instant Interbank Fund Transfer Transaction Types Favourite eIBFT Transfer Customer Name NADIRAH BINTI HASAN Transaction From Account No 1006411000109690 Transaction To Account No 163019615601 Amount 2,500.00 Effective Date 29/06/2015 Transaction Date 29/06/2015 08:55:06 AM Transaction Status: Unsuccessful Host Error Reason: - RRN2: -
[6/29/158:55:06:064 SGT] 00000082 SystemOut O Socket input data(in Hex): [29/06/2015] [08:55:06:111] [ERROR][IBInterbankFundTransferResultsServices]:527 - Error code : 9999 [6/29/158:55:06:111 SGT] 00000035 SystemOut O [29/06/2015][08:55:06:111] [ERROR] [IBInterbankFundTransferResultsServices]:527 - Errordetails : java.lang.NullPointerException at com.ib.enterprise.services.ib104_fundtransfer.others.IBTransferLimitConstant$ServiceCode$3.getTrasferLimit(IBTransferLimitConstant.java:131) atcom.ib.enterprise.services.ib104_fundtransfer.IBFundTransferSevices.getUserTransferLimit(IBFundTransferSevices.java:678) at com.ib.enterprise.services.ib104_fundtransfer.IBFundTransferSevices.checkTransferDailyLimitByServiceCode(IBFundTransferSevices.java:568) atcom.ib.enterprise.services.ib104_fundtransfer.interbank.transfer.IBInterbankFundTransferResultsServices.execute(IBInterbankFundTransferResultsServices.java:221) atcom.ib.rib.controller.actions.ib104_fundtransfer.interbank.transfer.IBInterbankTransferResultsAction.execute(IBInterbankTransferResultsAction.java:103) at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform(RequestProcessor.java:484) at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:274) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1482) at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:525) at com.ib.common.utils.IBActionServlet.doPost(IBActionServlet.java:82) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:738) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:831) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:1661) atcom.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:1602) atcom.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:149) atcom.ib.common.utils.SessionTimeoutFilter.doFilter(SessionTimeoutFilter.java:85) atcom.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.FilterInstanceWrapper.doFilter(FilterInstanceWrapper.java:190) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:125) atcom.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterChain._doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:80) atcom.ibm.ws.webcontainer.filter.WebAppFilterManager.doFilter(WebAppFilterManager.java:908) atcom.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.handleRequest(ServletWrapper.java:939) atcom.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapper.handleRequest(ServletWrapper.java:507) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.ServletWrapperImpl.handleRequest(ServletWrapperImpl.java:181) atcom.ibm.ws.webcontainer.servlet.CacheServletWrapper.handleRequest(CacheServletWrapper.java:91) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.WebContainer.handleRequest(WebContainer.java:878) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.WSWebContainer.handleRequest(WSWebContainer.java:1592) at com.ibm.ws.webcontainer.channel.WCChannelLink.ready(WCChannelLink.java:191) atcom.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.handleDiscrimination(HttpInboundLink.java:453) atcom.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.handleNewRequest(HttpInboundLink.java:515) at com.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpInboundLink.processRequest(HttpInboundLink.java:306) atcom.ibm.ws.http.channel.inbound.impl.HttpICLReadCallback.complete(HttpICLReadCallback.java:84) atcom.ibm.ws.tcp.channel.impl.AioReadCompletionListener.futureCompleted(AioReadCompletionListener.java:175) atcom.ibm.io.async.AbstractAsyncFuture.invokeCallback(AbstractAsyncFuture.java:217) atcom.ibm.io.async.AsyncChannelFuture.fireCompletionActions(AsyncChannelFuture.java:161) at com.ibm.io.async.AsyncFuture.completed(AsyncFuture.java:138) at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler.complete(ResultHandler.java:204) atcom.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler.runEventProcessingLoop(ResultHandler.java:775) at com.ibm.io.async.ResultHandler$2.run(ResultHandler.java:905) at com.ibm.ws.util.ThreadPool$Worker.run(ThreadPool.java:1656)
History
#1 Updated by Zahir Abd Latif about 9 years ago
- File A - SystemOut_15.06.29_09.06.42.log added
#2 Updated by Zahir Abd Latif about 9 years ago
- Status changed from New - Begin Life Cycle to Development / Work In Progress
#3 Updated by Zahir Abd Latif about 9 years ago
Update from Ruzaimah, Jul 2, 2015 03:10 PM:-
Temporary solution - update db and user has confirm issue resolved. update IB_TRANSFER_LIMIT set IBFT_OPEN_LIMIT=0 where IBFT_OPEN_LIMIT IS NULL Kindly check for permanent solution. From where and when system add/update IBFT_OPEN_LIMIT for IBFT_OPEN_LIMIT ? System should default to 0 for this field.
#4 Updated by Ngoh Chee Ping about 9 years ago
Permanent solution: Default the limit field to 0 in hibernate mapping file. Kartono will test it out in development first.
TQ
#5 Updated by Zahir Abd Latif about 9 years ago
Updated from Kartono, Jul 16, 2015 07:07 PM:-
Hi Ruzaimah, The solution has already been deployed in SIT and UAT environment. http://10.6.6.20/rib.sit/common/Login.do http://10.6.6.20/rib.uat/common/Login.do
#6 Updated by Zahir Abd Latif about 9 years ago
- File SIT Testcase to Penril.docx added
- File RIB_SIT.LOG added
Updated from Ruzaimah, Aug 6, 2015 05:23 PM:-
We have successfully registered new customer but when click Fund Transfer Limit - *still got Session Expired.* Attached the result.
Dear Kartono,
Kindly assist on this issue.
Thanks.
#7 Updated by Zahir Abd Latif about 9 years ago
- Status changed from Development / Work In Progress to Pending Customer Feedback
Update from Ruzaimah, Aug 11, 2015 10:49 AM:-
SIT successfully tested. Will send for UAT.
#8 Updated by Wijaya Kartono about 9 years ago
- Status changed from Pending Customer Feedback to Pending Prod Deployment
Update from Ruzaimah, Aug 13, 2015 05:27 PM:-
"UAT Succeeded. Plan to migrate tomorrow 12.00 am as usual due to production issue and has been raised up to higher management.
Kindly send us the deployment doc asap."
#9 Updated by Zahir Abd Latif about 9 years ago
- Status changed from Pending Prod Deployment to Closed - End of life cycle
- Assignee changed from Wijaya Kartono to Zahir Abd Latif
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Deployment successful.
Issue closed in SCP.