Bug #6775

[UAT_SB_LHDN-021] - LHDN 10 Report

Added by Norhaidah Md Dasuki almost 8 years ago. Updated almost 8 years ago.

Status:Closed - End of life cycleStart date:November 17, 2016
Priority:ImmediateDue date:November 17, 2016
Assignee:Norhaidah Md Dasuki% Done:

100%

Category:UAT - LHDNSpent time:-
Target version:-

Description

1. OPM File – Have more than 1 Header. It should be 1 header for all six transactions.
2. PPM File – Have more than 1 F- Header. It should be only 1 F.
3. LHDN request to exclude the space in between
4. Pay in slip no must unique.

Jeng Wei, Kindly fix. Issue reported based on LHDN feedback & request to perform UAT using different Employer Reference Number.

LHDN - Multiple_Insufficient_07.txt Magnifier (885 Bytes) Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli, November 10, 2016 18:32

LHDN - Multiple 08.txt Magnifier (885 Bytes) Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli, November 10, 2016 18:32

LHDN - Single_ Insufficient_08.txt Magnifier (885 Bytes) Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli, November 10, 2016 18:32

LHDN - Single_ Insufficient_08.txt Magnifier (885 Bytes) Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli, November 10, 2016 18:34

LHDN -Single_Sample_03.txt Magnifier (885 Bytes) Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli, November 10, 2016 18:34

LHDN - Multiple_Insufficient_07.txt Magnifier (885 Bytes) Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli, November 10, 2016 18:34

LHDN - Multiple 08.txt Magnifier (885 Bytes) Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli, November 10, 2016 18:34

Change #6775 Test Result [UAT_SB_LHDN-021] - LHDN 10 Report .docx (449 KB) Nurul Akmal, November 15, 2016 14:58

LHDN Report 141116Sabah.docx (613 KB) Norhaidah Md Dasuki, November 17, 2016 15:21

Change #6775 Test Result [UAT_SB_LHDN-021] - LHDN 10 Report .docx (1.02 MB) Nurul Akmal, November 18, 2016 18:43


Related issues

Related to Statutory Bodies - Bug #6767: [UAT_SB_LHDN-017] Closed - End of life cycle November 07, 2016
Related to Statutory Bodies - Bug #6769: [UAT_SB_LHDN-018] Closed - End of life cycle November 07, 2016
Related to Statutory Bodies - Bug #6770: [UAT_SB_LHDN-019] Closed - End of life cycle November 07, 2016

History

#1 Updated by Tan Jeng Wei almost 8 years ago

  • Status changed from New - Begin Life Cycle to Internal Testing
  • % Done changed from 0 to 90

Hi Erni,

1. OPM File – Have more than 1 Header. It should be 1 header for all six transactions.
2. PPM File – Have more than 1 F- Header. It should be only 1 F.

root/cause: Old version jar file..
solution: update jar file

3. LHDN request to exclude the space in between

root/cause: didn't check the last data
solution : check the last data without \n

4. Pay in slip no must unique.

root/cause: 20161110000000010000 --> requirement length 12 become 20161110000000 which is same with other
solution:20161110000000010000 --> taking yymmdd+ runner number

Please retest after deployed. Thanks a lot

#2 Updated by Tan Jeng Wei almost 8 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Tan Jeng Wei to Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli

#3 Updated by Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli almost 8 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli to Nurul Akmal

#4 Updated by Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli almost 8 years ago

Hi Kak Akmal,

For testing purpose kindly used attached file to do transaction. Please be noted that this system was not allowed user to upload the same file name, you need to change the file name before proceed to next transfer. Also attached is insufficient fund transfer file for you to perform Unsuccessful fund transfer. I also attached here sample file for Multiple Company and Single Company, please refer on file name.

#5 Updated by Erni Suhaireen Zulkifli almost 8 years ago

Hi Kak Akmal,

For testing purpose kindly used attached file to do transaction. Please be noted that this system was not allowed user to upload the same file name, you need to change the file name before proceed to next transfer. Also attached is insufficient fund transfer file for you to perform Unsuccessful fund transfer. I also attached here sample file for Multiple Company and Single Company, please refer on file name.

Than you

#6 Updated by Nurul Akmal almost 8 years ago

  • File Change #6775 Test Result [UAT_SB_LHDN-021] - LHDN 10 Report .docx added
  • Status changed from Internal Testing to Development / Work In Progress
  • Assignee changed from Nurul Akmal to Norhaidah Md Dasuki
  • % Done changed from 10 to 100

Dear Kak Haida,
Kindly review Test Result attached.

Thank you.

#7 Updated by Nurul Akmal almost 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Development / Work In Progress to Pending Review

#8 Updated by Nurul Akmal almost 8 years ago

Hi Kak Aida,
Updated test result.

Thank you.

#9 Updated by Nurul Akmal almost 8 years ago

  • File deleted (Change #6775 Test Result [UAT_SB_LHDN-021] - LHDN 10 Report .docx)

#10 Updated by Norhaidah Md Dasuki almost 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending Review to User Acceptance Test

Reviewed. Send for UAT

#11 Updated by Norhaidah Md Dasuki almost 8 years ago

  • File LHDN Report 141116Sabah.docx added
  • Due date changed from November 10, 2016 to November 17, 2016
  • Status changed from User Acceptance Test to Development / Work In Progress
  • Assignee changed from Norhaidah Md Dasuki to Tan Jeng Wei
  • Priority changed from High to Immediate
  • Start date changed from November 09, 2016 to November 17, 2016

Attached herewith the findings for 10 LHDN Report – Sabah, for transaction date 14/11/2016 .

Jeng Wei, kindly assist to fix.

#12 Updated by Tan Jeng Wei almost 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Development / Work In Progress to Internal Testing
  • Assignee changed from Tan Jeng Wei to Nurul Akmal

Hi Akmal,

*BSR
1. Transfer date of file – should be T+1 (Refer Specification)
- User confuse the date when generate and send to lhdn which we discuss just..
2. Field Name : Bank Account No. – consist of other LHDN A/C No. One report cater for one LHDN A/C No.
- root/cause: Getting the bank account based on company account.
- solution: getting bank account based on IBpayee Account
3.The amount is Total Amount of PCB & CP38
- root/cause: total amount calculate based on PCB amount only
-solution: Total amount calculate based on PCB amount + CP38amount
4.The pay-in slip no must be unique for each transaction. It also reflect at OPM, PPM
root/cause: play in slip in based on transaction id which is based on upload file. So many employee will pointing to same transaction id. User confusing on this and was discussed with ayu just now.

***OPM
1. Field Batch Number and BBMC_batch_number should be same.
- root/cause: BBCM batch_number based on file upload date
-solution: BBCM batch_number based on the date generate file.
2.The serial number not running : Refer specification below :
ayu confusing on this, serial number is fixed based on the requirement feedback from LHDN just put 01.
3. Where is the last line which referring to Pindahan ke JANM
user confusing because OPM no have trailer data and what we discussed just now.

  • ONR :
    1. The transaction amount is total amount of PCB and CP38
    -root/cause: amount based on PCB
    -solution: amount based on PCB + CP38
  • OSR
    1. OPM shows 4 transactions. The details not match
    - user confusing because transaction count is based on file upload. Not the detail inside the file.

#13 Updated by Nurul Akmal almost 8 years ago

Hi Kak Haida,
Updated Test Result.

Thank you.

#14 Updated by Norhaidah Md Dasuki almost 8 years ago

  • Status changed from Pending Review to Closed - End of life cycle

Successfully deployed to Production under migration ID065 on 2/12/2016 and Offline

Also available in: Atom PDF